It stresses on user-generated content and interoperability of netizens on dynamic websites. As opposed to Web 1.0, the second iteration or Web 2.0 can be described as the “read-write” web in which users have the ability to contribute content and interact with other web users. So, the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is crystal clear. So, in Web 2.0, online content (websites, apps, pictures, videos, etc.) gets a lot of descriptive information and ad hoc classification using natural language from the users themselves. In essence, Folksonomy is a way of organizing data and digital content wherein the users themselves add a tag or label to identify a piece of content. While Web 1.0 was extremely basic in its approach, Web 2.0 is based on a concept called Folksonomy. Web 2.0Īround 1999, as server technology upgraded, average internet connection speeds increased, and developers learned new skills and techniques, the transition happened from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0. At that time, most website owners just wanted to make their information available to anyone at any time, without any focus on user interaction. That is, it consisted of static websites and there was little-to-no user interaction or content generation. It all started with the first iteration of the Web, known as Web 1.0, which for the most part was “read-only” (as described by Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web). From extremely basic text-based web pages to full-fledged search engines and online stores, web technology has come a long way indeed. The Internet has evolved dramatically in the last two decades or so.
0 kommentar(er)
